1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 970 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
| Model | Ritmo | MK X |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3780 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 106 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 63 L |
