1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 930 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | Ritmo | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3130 mm |
