1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1965 Innocenti Mini
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Innocenti Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Innocenti Mini would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1965 Innocenti Mini. (36 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Innocenti Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 290 kg more than 1965 Innocenti Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Innocenti Mini. (56 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Innocenti Mini.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1965 Innocenti Mini | |
Make | Fiat | Innocenti |
Model | Ritmo | Mini |
Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 56 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2050 mm |