1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1968 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Seven (83 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 290 kg more than 1968 Lotus Seven.
Because 1968 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1968 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Ritmo | Seven |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2240 mm |