1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Ritmo | 66 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |