1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1980 Seat 131
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1980 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat 131 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1980 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (131 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1980 Seat 131 | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | Ritmo | 131 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |