1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1984 Honda HP-X
To start off, 1984 Honda HP-X is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Honda HP-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Honda HP-X weights approximately 315 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1984 Honda HP-X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Honda HP-X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1984 Honda HP-X | |
| Make | Fiat | Honda |
| Model | Ritmo | HP-X |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1155 kg |
