1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1985 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1985 Mercury Cougar is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 575 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1985 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1985 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Ritmo | Cougar |
Year Released | 1983 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |