1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Ritmo | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
