1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Racoon weights approximately 141 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault Racoon (107 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 Nm). This means 1992 Renault Racoon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Ritmo | Racoon |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2770 mm |
