1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (131 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (111 Nm). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Fiat | Fiat |
Model | Ritmo | Bravo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1372 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 111 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 67.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |