1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan AA-X weights approximately 355 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Ritmo | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |
