1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 300 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Ritmo | MK VI |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 41 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |
