1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1997 Mazda 626
To start off, 1997 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda 626 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda 626 (151 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1997 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Ritmo | 626 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |