1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1997 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1997 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1997 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Ritmo | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |