1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A (101 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 100 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1997 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ritmo | A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2430 mm |