1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (150 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 660 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Fiat | Acura |
Model | Ritmo | CL |
Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2715 mm |