1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1998 Ford Contour
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 491 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Contour (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1998 Ford Contour | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Contour |
Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5625 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 54 L |