1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Ritmo | R 391 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
