1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 985 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (270 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ritmo | SSS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2790 mm |