1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,855 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Porsche Boxster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (249 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2000 Porsche Boxster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Porsche Boxster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (309 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
| Make | Fiat | Porsche |
| Model | Ritmo | Boxster |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2855 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 249 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 309 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2420 mm |
