1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2000 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Suzuki Baleno (85 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki Baleno. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Fiat | Suzuki |
Model | Ritmo | Baleno |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |