1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2002 Ford F-250
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-250 (256 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2002 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | F-250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3490 mm |