1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Ritmo | 2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |