1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Covie (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki Covie (111 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Fiat | Suzuki |
| Model | Ritmo | Covie |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1530 mm |
