1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 800 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (299 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Ritmo | Tundra |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3270 mm |