1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 188 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 269 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2166 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 71 L |