1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 100 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Fiat Ritmo 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Fiat Mitsubishi
Model Ritmo Colt
Year Released 1983 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1714 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 57 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 105 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 920 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 3880 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2630 mm