1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2005 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (369 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2005 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Ritmo | Caprice |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 3788 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 369 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |