1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Ritmo | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 78 L |