1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 136 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ritmo | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 4996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2680 mm |