1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2005 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 482 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am (279 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Grand Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2005 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
Model | Ritmo | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1402 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2860 mm |