1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Fiat | Fiat |
Model | Ritmo | Croma |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 130 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |