1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 324 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 741 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Mustang |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 868 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1244 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |