1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 625 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Ritmo | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 86.7 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 72 L |