1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Maserati Quattroporte

To start off, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,245 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte (395 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.

Because 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Maserati Quattroporte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte (442 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Fiat Ritmo 2006 Maserati Quattroporte
Make Fiat Maserati
Model Ritmo Quattroporte
Year Released 1983 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1714 cc 4245 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 57 HP 395 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 7250 RPM
Torque 105 Nm 442 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4750 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 3070 mm