1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Ritmo | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 70 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |