1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee (216 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1249 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Ritmo | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 216 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2169 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 78 L |