1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 131 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | Fiat | Lada |
Model | Ritmo | 21 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 43 L |