1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2009 Lexus LS
To start off, 2009 Lexus LS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,608 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus LS (376 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus LS weights approximately 786 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus LS (493 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2009 Lexus LS | |
Make | Fiat | Lexus |
Model | Ritmo | LS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 4608 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 493 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1626 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2980 mm |