1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Ritmo | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 269 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 76 L |
