1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Spark. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 70 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Spark. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Chevrolet Spark | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | Spark |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 68 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 35 L |