1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (360 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | Traverse |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2173 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5207 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 83 L |