1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Fiat | Daihatsu |
Model | Ritmo | Sirion |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |