1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1885 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | F-250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 115 L |