1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Flex |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 262 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |