1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 168 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (175 Nm @ 1550 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Fiat Ritmo 2010 Volkswagen Polo
Make Fiat Volkswagen
Model Ritmo Polo
Year Released 1983 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1714 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 57 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 105 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1550 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 920 kg 1088 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1682 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1462 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2470 mm