1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | Malibu |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |