1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (113 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 710 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | C-Max |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2788 mm |