1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | Ritmo | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1714 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
